<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seth Godin Thinks Twitter is Worthless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/</link>
	<description>Thanks for reading.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dlyn</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>dlyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>I did notice that many people seemed to be misunderstanding the idea behind the project, whic I thought you had explained quite clearly.  Length and detail are apparently no guarantee of the readers&#039; understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did notice that many people seemed to be misunderstanding the idea behind the project, whic I thought you had explained quite clearly.  Length and detail are apparently no guarantee of the readers&#8217; understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck W.</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1404</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1404</guid>
		<description>As you see below in my reply to Vicki, I think you&#039;re actually right. There&#039;s a trade-off when it comes to trying to explain complexity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you see below in my reply to Vicki, I think you&#8217;re actually right. There&#8217;s a trade-off when it comes to trying to explain complexity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck W.</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>On second thought, I may agree with you more than with what I wrote originally.  I&#039;m okay with that.

Expressing a complicated idea in too few words is where misunderstanding can enter in.  Tweets, though, tend to be very simple ideas, so it is generally not an issue.

In any case, it depends on the reader making it all the way through the text. A short message gives up detail in exchange for greater odds of the person reading it all.  Longer text does the opposite.

Again, though, I think this applies mostly to complexity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On second thought, I may agree with you more than with what I wrote originally.  I&#8217;m okay with that.</p>
<p>Expressing a complicated idea in too few words is where misunderstanding can enter in.  Tweets, though, tend to be very simple ideas, so it is generally not an issue.</p>
<p>In any case, it depends on the reader making it all the way through the text. A short message gives up detail in exchange for greater odds of the person reading it all.  Longer text does the opposite.</p>
<p>Again, though, I think this applies mostly to complexity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicki</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 03:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>I guess I don&#039;t follow the same people you do Chuck. I can&#039;t imagine that I have &quot;misunderstood&quot; any of the tweets I&#039;ve read in the past year. 

True, occasionally, I don&#039;t get one. Usually that&#039;s because I&#039;m missing context (e.g. I don&#039;t get tweet replies to people I don&#039;t follow.)

As a technical writer by profession, I&#039;ve more often found that shorter is more preferable to a lot of people. The longer something is, the more my readers complain that they don&#039;t have time to read it. And when they don&#039;t finish, they miss a lot.

I don&#039;t think the length, per se, is really the issue. I think it&#039;s what&#039;s being said. To pull out an old chestnut (and add to it) - does the medium fit the message? And do the medium and message fit the audience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I don&#8217;t follow the same people you do Chuck. I can&#8217;t imagine that I have &#8220;misunderstood&#8221; any of the tweets I&#8217;ve read in the past year. </p>
<p>True, occasionally, I don&#8217;t get one. Usually that&#8217;s because I&#8217;m missing context (e.g. I don&#8217;t get tweet replies to people I don&#8217;t follow.)</p>
<p>As a technical writer by profession, I&#8217;ve more often found that shorter is more preferable to a lot of people. The longer something is, the more my readers complain that they don&#8217;t have time to read it. And when they don&#8217;t finish, they miss a lot.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the length, per se, is really the issue. I think it&#8217;s what&#8217;s being said. To pull out an old chestnut (and add to it) &#8211; does the medium fit the message? And do the medium and message fit the audience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s okay that we disagree, but I think if we had a longer conversation, we&#039;d be more likely to see eye-to-eye. I have a feeling that&#039;d be the case, at least. ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s okay that we disagree, but I think if we had a longer conversation, we&#8217;d be more likely to see eye-to-eye. I have a feeling that&#8217;d be the case, at least. ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;While all writing has to deal with this, I think it does get harder from medium to medium.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure, but I don&#039;t see how you can draw a straight line where misunderstanding descreases and you go from shorter to longer. In fact, in my head, I associate brevity with more clarity.

Different mediums might be more or less clear, but that&#039;s going to vary by what medium the content is most suited to, the teller&#039;s skills/preferences, the hearer&#039;s skills/preferences, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>While all writing has to deal with this, I think it does get harder from medium to medium.</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, but I don&#8217;t see how you can draw a straight line where misunderstanding descreases and you go from shorter to longer. In fact, in my head, I associate brevity with more clarity.</p>
<p>Different mediums might be more or less clear, but that&#8217;s going to vary by what medium the content is most suited to, the teller&#8217;s skills/preferences, the hearer&#8217;s skills/preferences, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>But even if you work really hard and do a great job of writing something clear and direct, someone will often misunderstand.

If you go read the post that kicked off my project, you&#039;ll see it very clearly lays out the plan. Still, I had dozens of people thinking that each blog that commented would get a visit.

It just happens--you can&#039;t control it, as you say, but you can improve the odds or worsen the odds. That all depends on what your goal is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But even if you work really hard and do a great job of writing something clear and direct, someone will often misunderstand.</p>
<p>If you go read the post that kicked off my project, you&#8217;ll see it very clearly lays out the plan. Still, I had dozens of people thinking that each blog that commented would get a visit.</p>
<p>It just happens&#8211;you can&#8217;t control it, as you say, but you can improve the odds or worsen the odds. That all depends on what your goal is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>Being misunderstood in literature may be neutral, but being misunderstood in communication is quite often bad.

While all writing has to deal with this, I think it does get harder from medium to medium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being misunderstood in literature may be neutral, but being misunderstood in communication is quite often bad.</p>
<p>While all writing has to deal with this, I think it does get harder from medium to medium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1395</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1395</guid>
		<description>The short blog post can be a discipline, but there&#039;s a place for them. It&#039;s a nice change of pace.

The key is just taking one small idea and saying it rather than explaining an entire line of thinking. That&#039;s the whole crux of this being misunderstood issue, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short blog post can be a discipline, but there&#8217;s a place for them. It&#8217;s a nice change of pace.</p>
<p>The key is just taking one small idea and saying it rather than explaining an entire line of thinking. That&#8217;s the whole crux of this being misunderstood issue, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Westbrook</title>
		<link>http://chuckwestbrook.com/seth-godin-thinks-twitter-is-worthless/comment-page-1/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Westbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chuckwestbrook.com/?p=396#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>Glad you liked it. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you liked it. <img src='http://chuckwestbrook.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
